This past summer, I implemented a self-imposed summer
reading assignment. The assignment was to re-read each autobiography written by
the members of KISS, including the self-help/second autobiography by Gene
Simmons, Sex, Money, Kiss. That
reading assignment has spilled over into the fall and may continue into the
winter at the pace I’ve been reading lately. Here’s my review of Sex, Money, Kiss (LINK) the first book I
re-read for the assignment.
The second book I completed was Peter Criss’ Makeup To Breakup. This has always been
my least favorite of the biographies. Partially because Peter may be my least
favorite member of the band, and partially because Criss does an awful lot of
whining and finger pointing, never truly accepting his part of the blame for
his demise with the band.
Makeup To Breakup
contains a lot of revisionist history. There are several stories told where
Peter plays the hero, but I have my doubts they actually happened the way he
explains. There is also a lot of complaining and “feel sorry for me, it wasn’t
really my fault” bullshit tossed throughout the entire book. However, there is
also a brutal honesty in some of the memories that Criss decided to include. And
it is the brutal honesty that makes his memoir intriguing. He holds nothing
back. Whether it’s his drugged out lifestyle, his gun touting, near shootout
with the local cops, or his over the top antics with his partner in crime, Ace
Frehley, Peter Criss shares all the happenings of his wild and crazy life.
And even though he decides to tell all in his memoirs,
there are some glaringly different sides of classic KISS tales told throughout
this book as well. The ad that was placed in Rolling Stone magazine, how “Beth”
was ultimately recorded, the demise of the Cat Man, his return for one more try
before the Unmasked tour, and his
ultimate firing, are all told through the eyes of Peter Criss. Which are very
different eyes than the eyes of Ace, Gene, and Paul that recounted these
stories in their respective biographies. That’s the thing about the truth – it
lies between the many sides of the story being told.
Criss’ take on why his solo albums did not sell well is
definitely sordid. He claims the record company did not want him to be
successful; when they still had KISS on their roster, so they buried his
albums, or refused to release them in the USA at all. That sounds odd to me,
and more like an excuse as to why the records did so poorly. Rather than fess
up to the truth, that the albums just weren’t that good and were recorded by
someone who was out of his mind on cocaine and Quaaludes, Peter simply blamed
the record company for lack of execution.
The problem with Peter Criss is Peter Criss. It’s clear
from his memoirs that he felt the world owed him everything. Paranoia and
delusions didn’t help him either. He felt that the acoustic shows in 1995 were
a “test” and that the reunion tour was just a way that Gene and Paul could make
money. He failed to take any blame for things that went wrong in his life. It
was always someone else’s fault, never his own, and he always had a reason and
a story as to why.
After reading Makeup
To Breakup I can understand why Paul and Gene wanted Peter out of the band
and didn’t want to work with him anymore. I was getting angry as I read! I
wanted to smack Peter around, tell him to quit acting like a baby and to wake
up!
At certain times the book isn’t even an autobiography,
it’s a pages long diatribe on why Gene, Paul, and Ace are such evil and vile
people. Peter comes off as the whiny child that never grew up and is still
upset years later that he didn’t get his way. His jealousy over the other
members of the band shines bright throughout the tale of his life. He claims
anger and disgust with each member of the band in their own way, but when the
astute read between the lines it is clear that Peter is upset he is nothing sans
KISS.
Peter Criss is delusion and looks at the past with a
revisionist sight. His stories are far-fetched and he struggles to find ways
that he is better than everyone in the group. His claims of how every tour was
unsuccessful until they re-signed him are just exhausting. And his constant bad
mouthing of the band mates that gave him a second, third, and fourth chance are
sickening. He is just a whiny child in a 60-something year old’s body. And that
is as sad as it is frustrating.
1 comment:
Interesting post, I've heard several people suggest that Peter Criss may not be the sharpest knife in the drawer, so I guess it isn't surprising he comes across poorly in the book. He does seem very bitter which on the surface is understandable, but once you get into it you realize it was all his fault.
I've had a very strong dislike of Gene Simmons for years too. And come to think of it, Paul and Ace really aren't particularly likable people either. Strange band!
Post a Comment